Une fois n'est pas coutume, je vais râler un bon coup.
Once is not custom, I'll grumble.
In the journal "Pour la science" (French version of "Scientific American"), issue of January 2013, I read an article about crowdsourcing, especially via the Internet, ie the fact to ask to a large number of people to solve problems that a person can not solve alone or with PC. This principle has given very good results in biology or astronomy. Until then, no problem, I think it is even one of the major contributions of Internet.
Where it becomes much less nice is that this principle is also used to make you work without your knowledge. You all know the CAPTCHA, which asks you transcribe a word before submitting a comment. You notice that for some time, deconding a photograph is also asked. Well, I quote the magazine "The second image is an image from a document that managers [..] want to scan and that recognition algorithms [...] have identified as sensitive or totally unreadable. The user second response can scan the incomprehensible piece .[...] The system is used for archives of the New York Times." Yes, you understand it, you do free work without your knowledge. By cons, you can be sure that this service is charged by the blog hosters.
Et ce n'est pas une rumeur, faites le test vous-même, si vous rentrer correctement les lettres, mais que vous tapez n'importe quoi pour la photo, ça marche quand même, preuve que la machine ne connaît pas la signification de cette image.
And this is not a rumor, do the test yourself, if you return the correct letters, but you type anything for the photo, it works anyway, proof that the machine does not know the meaning of this picture.
And this is not a rumor, do the test yourself, if you return the correct letters, but you type anything for the photo, it works anyway, proof that the machine does not know the meaning of this picture.
Alors franchement, je ne demande pas mieux que de donner un coup de main pour un cause intéressante, mais aider, à mon insu, une société cotée en bourse à se remplir les poches me dégoûte franchement. Donc, d'une part, j'ai désactivé la vérification sur mon blog (je la remettrai si j'ai trop de messages indésirables) et systématiquement, je mets une réponse fausse pour la photo. Ça n'empêche pas mon commentaire d'être validé, et c'est ma façon de protester contre ce comportement inacceptable, à mi-chemin entre la prise l'otage et l'arnaque.
Sincerely, I am happy to help for a interesting case, but be used by a publicly traded company to make money shocks me. So, on the one hand, I disabled the CAPTCHA on my blog and systematically, I put a wrong answer for the photo. That does not prevent my comment to be validated, and this is my way to protest against this unacceptable behavior, halfway between the hostage taking and scam.
Sincerely, I am happy to help for a interesting case, but be used by a publicly traded company to make money shocks me. So, on the one hand, I disabled the CAPTCHA on my blog and systematically, I put a wrong answer for the photo. That does not prevent my comment to be validated, and this is my way to protest against this unacceptable behavior, halfway between the hostage taking and scam.
