J'ai terminé un nouveau morceau de ce grand personnage :
I finished a new piece of this great character :
La zone est petite, mais il y avait pas mal de travail dessus. On reconnait bien les guêtres vikings que l'on retrouve sur toutes les représentations traditionnelles. Le soucis, c'est que le dessin sur la toile était pour le moins éloigné de l'original.
The area is small, but there was a lot of work on it. We recognize easily viking gaiters wihich can be found on all traditional representations. The concern is that the drawing on the canvas was really different from the original.
I finished a new piece of this great character :
The area is small, but there was a lot of work on it. We recognize easily viking gaiters wihich can be found on all traditional representations. The concern is that the drawing on the canvas was really different from the original.
Embroidering this section, I noticed a detail. As I have explained above, large color areas are embroidered in Bayeux stitch, and the smaller ones are filled in stem stitch. This is the case for the gaiters blue "boxes". If we look closely, we see that in each "stage", the main line runs along the top. And what can be inferred ? The embroider worked from the top of the leg to the foot. This is logical : it is easier to start the triangle by the longest line, and necessarily, passing from one triangle to the other, we'll do it the closer to the previous area. So, it was stitched from top to bottom. Of course, this is a detail, but finding the actions of the person who worked 1000 years ago has something touching. Isn't it ? (I am sorry, my explanations are probabily foggy, but writing in English is difficult for me).
Another point, there is a problem which we have already discussed. The tapestry was almost entirely embroidered in stem stitch and Bayeux stitch. But occasionally, there are the chain stitch and split stitch. Of course, it can be restoration. It is always the issue with this work : is what I see real, or is it a restoration ? To resolve this dilemma definitively, I decided to follow this principle: if nothing proves that it is a restoration, I suppose that it is authentic. So here, split stitch or chain stitch? Some tests have convinced me that it was split stitch with two thread which was the closer to the model. So split stitch!